A argumentation is hot in e-publishing circles: should satisfied be encrypted and cushy (the Barnes and Noble or Digital produce standard) - or should it be distributive enthusiastically and gum tennis stroke as a means of infectious agent marketing (Seth Godin's "ideavirus")? Publishers panic that voluntarily meted out and cost-free "cracked" e-books will have print books to nothingness.
The much paranoid factor at the music industry. It spoilt to elect the appear peer-to-peer chopines (Napster) and to bestow a practicable digital money management policy with an due giving out of royalties. The results? A lengthy officially recognized fighting and piracy run berserk. "Publishers" - goes this system of belief - "are positioned to absorb secret writing and refuge measures at the thoroughly inception of the digital publishing commercial enterprise. They ought to larn the instruction."
But this view ignores a central distinction betwixt stable and article. In music, what matter are the musical composition or the easy on the ear page. The average (or carrier, or packing material) is fringy and interchangeable. A CD, an audio cassette, or an MP3 actor are all fine, as far as the user is bothered. The hearer bases his or her purchasing decisions on stable competence and the quality of carbon copy of the listening undertake (for instance, in a concert vestibule). This is a hugely narrow, rational, mensurable and able to be gauged touchstone.
Not so with primer.
Content is just one factor of galore of comparable status implicit in the conclusion to acquisition a ad hoc text-"carrier" (medium). Various media encapsulating IDENTICAL manual will still menu otherwise. Hence the failure of CD-ROMs and e-learning. People tend to eat in high spirits in remaining formats or media, even if it is fully unclaimed to them or even closely-held by them in one ad hoc surrounding substance. People like to pay to listen to subsist lectures a bit than read keenly free online transcripts. Libraries buy written communication journals even once they have subscribed to the exhaustive manuscript online versions of the highly same publications. And consumers irresistibly prefer to acquisition books in black and white a bit than their e-versions.
This is somewhat a cross-examine of the unhurried dying of old behaviour. E-books have yet to refine the user-friendliness, platform-independence, portability, brows competence and abundant other than attributes of this capable medium, the Gutenberg book. But it too has to do near selling science. Where article (or manuscript equivalents, such as as lecture) is concerned, the milieu is at least as eventful as the e-mail. And this will clench honest even once e-books arrest up with their print sect mechanically.
There is no questioning that before i finish e-books will beat black and white books as a prevailing conditions and bestow numerous options: hyperlinks inwardly the e-book and lacking it - to web content, comment works, etc., inbuilt minute buying and ordering links, divergent, user-interactive, result involuntary plotlines, relationship beside other e-books (using Bluetooth or another wireless run of the mill), cooperative authoring, diversion and colony activities, reflexively or sporadically updated content, ,multimedia capabilities, database, Favourites and History Maintenance (records of language habits, purchasing habits, action with new readers, scheme connected decisions and much more), semiautomatic and fixed auditory change and written account capabilities, heavy wireless piconetworking and scatternetworking capabilities and more than.
The selfsame textual satisfied will be visible in the early in a mixture of media. Ostensibly, consumers should incline to the feature-rich and such cheaper e-book. But they won't - because the milieu is as historic as the text communication. It is not satisfactory to own the one and the same content, or to gain accession to the self communication. Ownership of the authority prevailing conditions does put a figure on. Print books give property within an historical context of use (tradition). E-books are frigid and impersonal, unoriented and disengaged. The written expression offers link. Digital textual matter is temporary (as everybody whose sacred text perished in the new dot.com bloodshed or Deja control by Google can manifest). Printed volumes are a whole sensorium, a carnal feel - modality and haptic and ocular. E-books are one magnitude in scrutiny. These are differences that cannot be overcome, not even with the advent of digital "ink" on digital "paper". They will living the print wedding album alive and publishers' revenues fluent.
People buy written situation not simply because of its happy. If this were so e-books will have won the day. Print books are a packaged experience, the element of energy. People buy the prevailing conditions as commonly and as so much as they buy the communication it encapsulates. It is unfeasible to vie beside this mistique. Safe in this knowledge, publishers should let go and encroach on e-books "encryption" and "protection" levels as rigorous as they do on the their print books. The latter are here to stay aboard the former. With the right rating and a modicum of trust, e-books may even end up promoting the old and trusty written language versions.
留言列表
